🔗 Share this article

Within the initial chapters of Authentic: The Myth of Bringing Your Full Self to Work, speaker Jodi-Ann Burey poses a challenge: everyday injunctions to “come as you are” or “bring your full, authentic self to work” are far from well-meaning invitations for individuality – they can be pitfalls. Her first book – a mix of memoir, studies, cultural critique and discussions – seeks to unmask how organizations take over individual identity, shifting the weight of organizational transformation on to staff members who are already vulnerable.

Career Path and Larger Setting

The driving force for the publication originates in part in Burey’s own career trajectory: different positions across corporate retail, emerging businesses and in global development, viewed through her experience as a Black disabled woman. The conflicting stance that the author encounters – a back-and-forth between expressing one’s identity and seeking protection – is the driving force of her work.

It emerges at a time of collective fatigue with corporate clichés across the United States and internationally, as backlash to DEI initiatives mount, and numerous companies are cutting back the very systems that once promised transformation and improvement. Burey enters that terrain to argue that retreating from authenticity rhetoric – namely, the business jargon that trivializes identity as a collection of aesthetics, quirks and interests, keeping workers concerned with managing how they are perceived rather than how they are regarded – is not an effective response; we must instead reinterpret it on our individual conditions.

Underrepresented Employees and the Display of Identity

By means of colorful examples and discussions, the author demonstrates how marginalized workers – people of color, LGBTQ+ people, women, people with disabilities – learn early on to calibrate which identity will “pass”. A weakness becomes a disadvantage and people overcompensate by attempting to look agreeable. The effort of “showing your complete identity” becomes a display surface on which various types of expectations are cast: affective duties, disclosure and ongoing display of gratitude. As the author states, employees are requested to expose ourselves – but lacking the defenses or the trust to survive what arises.

As Burey explains, employees are requested to reveal ourselves – but absent the protections or the trust to survive what emerges.’

Illustrative Story: An Employee’s Journey

The author shows this situation through the narrative of an employee, a hearing-impaired staff member who took it upon himself to inform his colleagues about deaf culture and communication norms. His eagerness to discuss his background – a gesture of candor the organization often applauds as “genuineness” – temporarily made everyday communications more manageable. But as Burey shows, that improvement was precarious. After personnel shifts eliminated the casual awareness the employee had developed, the culture of access dissolved with it. “All the information went away with the staff,” he comments exhaustedly. What was left was the weariness of being forced to restart, of being made responsible for an institution’s learning curve. According to Burey, this is what it means to be requested to expose oneself lacking safeguards: to face exposure in a framework that applauds your openness but refuses to codify it into regulation. Genuineness becomes a trap when companies count on personal sharing rather than organizational responsibility.

Literary Method and Notion of Opposition

The author’s prose is simultaneously understandable and expressive. She marries scholarly depth with a tone of solidarity: an offer for readers to engage, to interrogate, to oppose. In Burey’s opinion, workplace opposition is not noisy protest but moral resistance – the effort of rejecting sameness in environments that demand thankfulness for simple belonging. To dissent, from her perspective, is to interrogate the accounts companies describe about justice and acceptance, and to reject participation in customs that perpetuate unfairness. It may appear as identifying prejudice in a meeting, choosing not to participate of uncompensated “equity” effort, or setting boundaries around how much of oneself is provided to the institution. Dissent, she suggests, is an assertion of personal dignity in spaces that often reward conformity. It constitutes a habit of honesty rather than opposition, a way of maintaining that one’s humanity is not dependent on organizational acceptance.

Reclaiming Authenticity

The author also avoids inflexible opposites. Her work does not simply toss out “authenticity” completely: instead, she urges its reclamation. According to the author, authenticity is far from the unfiltered performance of character that corporate culture frequently praises, but a more intentional harmony between individual principles and individual deeds – a principle that opposes manipulation by organizational requirements. Rather than treating sincerity as a mandate to disclose excessively or adapt to cleansed standards of candor, the author encourages readers to maintain the parts of it grounded in honesty, individual consciousness and moral understanding. In her view, the objective is not to give up on authenticity but to move it – to move it out of the executive theatrical customs and toward interactions and offices where reliance, justice and accountability make {